Epic Games VS Apple. Again

Drama

28 September 2023 14:12

Epic Games is on a warpath against Apple once again. The petition before the Supreme Court seeks a ruling on more extensive antitrust issues regulated by the Sherman Act. Per GamesBeat Epic Games is asking,

If a “less-restrictive alternative” must be free from costs to Apple. If a “less-restrictive alternative” doesn’t exist, is the restraint invalid, if the harm to competition substantially outweighs the restraint’s procompetitive justification.

Epic contends that limitations on business practices, which yield both positive and negative competitive outcomes, are illegal if there exists a "less-restrictive alternative" capable of delivering similar advantages while causing less harm to competition.

Tags: Epic Games Apple

Share:

Sources:

Report mistake Submit news

Related news

View All

Apple's Reasonable Fee Request Accepted

Apple has won a small victory in its long-running legal battle with Epic Games after a recent appeal ruling in...

Drama

Dec 15, 2025

Epic Games CEO: AI will be involved in nearly all future production

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has shared his thoughts on whether game storefronts should label titles made with AI. His...

More

Nov 28, 2025

Epic Games Partners with Unity

Epic Games and Unity have unveiled a new partnership that will allow developers to publish Unity games within Fortnite, marking...

Business

Nov 20, 2025

Google and Epic Signs Deal for Third-party Stores

Google and Epic Games may finally be putting an end to their long legal battle. The two companies have reached...

Business

Nov 06, 2025

Apple Lost Antitrust Lawsuit

Apple has been found guilty of abusing its dominant position in the app distribution market, following a landmark ruling by...

More

Oct 27, 2025

Epic Games VS Apple. Again

Drama

28 September 2023 14:12

Tags: Epic Games Apple

Epic Games is on a warpath against Apple once again. The petition before the Supreme Court seeks a ruling on more extensive antitrust issues regulated by the Sherman Act. Per GamesBeat Epic Games is asking,

If a “less-restrictive alternative” must be free from costs to Apple. If a “less-restrictive alternative” doesn’t exist, is the restraint invalid, if the harm to competition substantially outweighs the restraint’s procompetitive justification.

Epic contends that limitations on business practices, which yield both positive and negative competitive outcomes, are illegal if there exists a "less-restrictive alternative" capable of delivering similar advantages while causing less harm to competition.

Share:

Sources:

Report mistake Submit news