Hutch Games Under Fire

Business

04 October 2023 16:06

The UK's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ruled against Hutch Games for breaching regulations regarding loot box disclosure. The ASA determined that advertisements for F1 Clash: Car Racing Manager on the App Store and Rebel Racing on Google Play were deceptive because they failed to mention the presence of paid loot boxes in the games. Hutch Games defended their position, arguing that such disclosure was unnecessary because players could advance in the game without spending money.

Tags: Hutch Games

Share:

Sources:

Report mistake Submit news

Related news

View All

G2 Esports Partners with Betpanda

G2 Esports has revealed a new partnership with Betpanda, an online crypto casino platform. Starting in 2026, Betpanda will become...

Business

Dec 03, 2025

ByteDance Looking to Sell Moonton

TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, is reportedly discussing the sale of Shanghai Moonton Technology Co., the studio behind Mobile Legends: Bang...

Business

Dec 01, 2025

FaZe Esports Pass Launched

GameSquare Holdings, has announced the launch of the FaZe Esports Pass. This new digital membership is developed in partnership with...

Business

Nov 24, 2025

Ubisoft Reveals H1 Earnings

Ubisoft has reported first half earnings that beat expectations and says its €1.16 billion partnership deal with Tencent remains on...

Business

Nov 21, 2025

Epic Games Partners with Unity

Epic Games and Unity have unveiled a new partnership that will allow developers to publish Unity games within Fortnite, marking...

Business

Nov 20, 2025

Hutch Games Under Fire

Business

04 October 2023 16:06

Tags: Hutch Games

The UK's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ruled against Hutch Games for breaching regulations regarding loot box disclosure. The ASA determined that advertisements for F1 Clash: Car Racing Manager on the App Store and Rebel Racing on Google Play were deceptive because they failed to mention the presence of paid loot boxes in the games. Hutch Games defended their position, arguing that such disclosure was unnecessary because players could advance in the game without spending money.

Share:

Sources:

Report mistake Submit news