Another day, another teamw ith unpaid wages.
Dplus KIA reportedly owing its League of Legends roster a month's salary would be alarming on its own. What makes it genuinely precarious is that Riot has already demonstrated, this year, exactly what happens next. According to Korean outlet Daily e-Sports, citing industry sources, the DK squad is currently one month behind on wages, down from a peak of two months after a recent partial payment, with players across all of the organisation's disciplines affected. The report also notes the LCK's own rulebook is the problem, quoting an industry insider stating that "in the LCK, a request for contract termination can be made if wages are overdue by a month." That's not a distant theoretical risk. DK is reportedly sitting on that exact threshold right now.
The reason this should worry anyone invested in the organisation is what Riot did in March, because it's essentially a completed dress rehearsal. ULF Esports won its way into VCT EMEA through Ascension, then reportedly failed to pay its players and staff a single cheque for the entire duration of its stay in the league, with earlier reporting having flagged its League of Legends division as missing several months of salary well before that. Riot terminated the organisation's participation outright on March 20, the first mid-season ejection in VCT EMEA's history, stripping it of its partnership slot. Crucially, Riot didn't vacate the spot, it handed the players the keys. As the company put it, "our priority following this decision was to ensure that the players, who earned their place in VCT EMEA through Ascension, were able to continue competing in the league," adding that it "provided the roster with the option to sign with a new organisation of their choice." Four of the five ULF players walked into Eternal Fire and kept playing. The org died, the roster survived.
The Template Fits, Right Up Until It Doesn't
Line the two situations up and the mechanism is identical: reports of unpaid wages, a governing body with contractual authority, and a stated priority of protecting the players over preserving the brand. Where the comparison starts to strain is the practical bit, and it's the part that matters most for DK. ULF worked because Eternal Fire existed, a well-resourced Turkish organisation already competing in Tier 2 with its finances in order and an obvious appetite for promotion. Riot could review it, approve it, and slot it in. The LCK is a closed partnership league in a far more compressed market, and the regular season resumes on July 29, which leaves an extremely narrow window to find, vet, and install a replacement organisation capable of absorbing a roster reportedly costing around 3 billion KRW a year, roughly $2 million. If no buyer materialises in time, "protecting the players" becomes a much harder promise to keep, and DK's place in the Legends Group for Rounds 3 and 4 gets genuinely murky.
The Sale That Didn't Happen
Dplus KIA hasn't hidden from this, which is worth noting. An unnamed representative quoted in the report confirmed the situation directly, saying "it is true," and attributing the shortfall to a stalled transaction: "delays in the sale of the team disrupted our financial planning. We sought the players' understanding in advance and are currently working toward a swift resolution. We plan to release an official statement soon." So the org is reportedly trying to sell the roster to escape the cost of maintaining it, and the failure of that sale to close is what left the wages short. That's an ugly loop. You can't pay because you can't sell, and the longer you can't pay, the more the asset you're trying to sell risks being dismantled by the league.
The salary figure itself tells its own story about LCK economics. This is a lineup built primarily around rookies, with three of the five the youngest players in their respective positions in the league, anchored by veteran midlaner ShowMaker, and it still runs to roughly $2 million annually. For a 2020 World Champion organisation that failed to reach Worlds for the first time in its history last year, that's a cost base that only makes sense if the results justify it, and lately they haven't. It's also worth being clear-eyed about the evidentiary picture here, since the wage claim currently rests on one outlet's industry sources, albeit with what reads as an organisational confirmation attached, and Riot has said nothing publicly. But the ULF case removed any doubt about whether Riot will act on this kind of thing. It will. The only real question is whether anyone shows up to catch the players when it does.
More:Battlefield 6 Season 4: Naval Warfare Launches July 21
Read
Source Editing
Visual Editing
Related news
